If I Were President…

We hear it all of the time, “If I were president, I would….”  I’m no different than anybody else in this regard, and I would like to place my two cents worth into the mix (I just hope I don’t get taxed for that two cent contribution).

If I were president, I would;

  1. Buy stock in Grecian Formula to maintain my youthful appearance (have you seen how old these people look after a few months in office?).
  2. I would pick people who actually KNOW more about particular areas than I do, to be in my cabinet.
  3. On my first day in office, I would forego the Inaugural Parade, and Ball, and instead meet with the Majority / Minority leaders from both houses, and the USSC Chief Justice, to get our expectations on the same page (which means that the American Citizen comes FIRST, and everyone else thereafter).
  4. I would severely limit my travel to other nations, or around the United States, except when it is a necessity.  I would not travel around to promote my agenda, nor would I travel abroad to apologize for whatever the United States has done, or not done.
  5. I would severely limit how much money is spent on White House affairs (i.e: Birthday celebrations, dinners, etc.), and vacations, and out that savings back into helping Americans get out of financial trouble.
  6. I would set the example by asking for a reduction is wages, and expect the congress to do likewise.  I would also ask for a Constitutional Amendment where raises for government representatives be based on merit (approval ratings by their respected districts or states), including the president, vice president, and the Supreme Court justices.  If an employer can give you a raise based on performance, then why not a politician?
  7. I would demand that spending be slashed by 50%, and borrowing be slashed by 90%.  The savings would be applied towards paying down the national debt.  Obama said, “I want the world to know that the United States pays their bills.”  What a great way to show that than by becoming fiscally responsible in the paying of debts, instead of making them bigger?
  8. I would demand that multiple departments doing the same job, be consolidated into one department, under one boss, and then streamlined to prevent the left hand from not knowing what the right hand is doing.
  9. I would demand that the budget be reduced to allow taxes to go down on Americans.  You can’t pay with what you don’t have.  Plus the government needs to learn to start tightening their belts a little, just like they expect us to do.
  10. I would demand that any immigrant living in the United States become a citizen within two years after I take office, or be tossed out.  It shouldn’t take that long to apply for citizenship, learn the history, take the test, and become a citizen.
  11. I would demand that the laws of this nation be followed by all forms of government within the United States (local, county, state, and federal).  I would also set up a panel to look at the laws, find out what pertains, what is current, and what is valid, and have the remainder removed.  Do we need laws about walking a whale down Main Street only at certain times of the day?
  12. I would demand that Mexico, and whatever other nation people immigrate here illegally from, be more responsible for their own people, and to stop sending them here.
  13. I would rebuild the military and respect it.  As a veteran, that is my duty and responsibility.
  14. I would demand that the US Supreme Court stop ruling by the heart, and start ruling per the laws and Constitution of the United States of America.
  15. I would demand that all American citizens have equal voice in this nation…including Christians.
  16. I would not get involved in matters that do not involve the Office of the President of the United States of America.  Hence, I would not get involved in situations like: the Thomas Gates affair, Trayvon Martin affair, Major Hassan affair, etc.  However, being the Commander-in-Chief, I would get involved in situations like Hassan’s, because it happened on a military base, and I would demand the death penalty for him, instead of letting him sit in jail to be pardoned upon the end of my 2nd term (like Obama is doing).
  17. I would not expect anyone to do anything that I would not be willing to do.  The pay cut is a prime example.
  18. I would demand that the tax payers stop paying for former politicians, unless they retired from government service.  If they were voted out, they cannot retire, and are not eligible for pension.
  19. I would give a stimulus to anyone who can put together a team, build a product, prove the necessity of that product, prove they can build it in the United States,  hire only American citizens to build that product, and agree to not move it to anywhere else in the world.  They must also agree to keep prices low, in order to become globally competitive, and remain union free.  Failure to do so will result in repayment of the stimulus money with interest.
  20. I would demand that we stop cutting down our woodlands, and grasslands, to build shopping centers and housing editions, and begin reusing the empty structures that already exist.  Does it make sense to have 50 shopping centers in a town, and only two, or three, stores out of a dozen actually have a business in them?  Does it make sense to continue building housing editions when there are so many empty homes in the existing editions?
  21. I would demand that all of my administration take ethics, compliance, Constitution, and accountability courses within the first year of my administration.  This will alleviate the scandals that are rocking the White Hizzle today, and replace the trust in the government that has been lost over the years.
  22. I would do away with the ‘Do-as-I-say, and Not-as-I-do’ mentality that exists in the government today.  These people are representatives of the people of their districts and states, not gods or masters.
  23. I would be a frequent visitor to the Congress if they can’t get the job done.  My office is in Washington D.C., and that’s where I would plan to spend the vast majority of my time.  If they want to play games, then they’ll do it under my watchful eye, and I’ll let the public know who is playing what games, and what it’s costing them in the meantime. Congress needs to learn that the people come before politics.

These are but a few of the things I would do.  There are many, many others, but I haven’t had lunch yet, and I have things to do.  The point is to get the people thinking again, and to get the government to realize what priority #1 is again.  Priority #1 is not them, their buddies, other nations, or piddly little crap that is expensive and makes no difference to humanity whatsoever.  It is the citizens of this land that come first.  They pay taxes, vote, bleed, sweat, and die in this nation every day.  If it weren’t for the citizens, we would have no government at all, now would we?

So write my name in on the next election, or coerce me to run for office in some capacity or another, and I’ll do the job to the best of my abilities.  That’s about all I can do, when you think about it.

Obama’s Waterloo — Benghazi

Last year, on 9/11/2012, the United States Embassy was attacked in Benghazi, Lybia, costing us the lives of US Ambassador Chris Stevens, and four security personnel.  Since that time, we have seen the Obama administration do everything they can to avoid the situation, including trying to pass the buck and blame the GOP for ‘politicizing’ it to prevent Hillary Clinton from running for president in 2016.

Today, 05/13/2013, Obama held a press conference and began blasting the GOP for telling lies, and grandstanding the investigation.  The only person spreading lies was Obama, himself.  I’m thinking that he subscribes to the Joe Biden theory that Americans are too dumb, or ignorant, to pay attention to what goes on in our government.  I’m sure that he also thinks that Americans will not research what was said to support the fact that Obama, and Hillary Clinton, are lying through their teeth about Benghazi.  The problem is; we’re smarter than he thinks.

Here is a timeline of what Obama has said with his own mouth:

Do you notice a pattern developing here?  These events happened in a matter of two weeks, and they all point to the complete ineptitude of the White House, the State Department, and all the patients in the Obama mental ward, to develop a consistent story, and stick to it.  The ineptitude of the White House, State Department, and the patients in the Obama mental ward, to adequately staff the embassy with proper security levels, also shows the lack of concern over the lives of Americans abroad, serving this nation.

As if you need further proof of the stupidity of this corrupt administration, I have one more little tidbit of the ‘TIMELINE OF FAILURE’ for your consideration;

To say that this administration makes me sick, would be an understatement.  The total lack of concern over Americans serving abroad, in lieu of the concern over covering the posteriors of the president and Sec. of State, is incredible.  This is beyond criminal, but unfortunately, we don’t have a reliable Attorney General to prosecute his boss for obvious crimes.  Even George W. Bush wasn’t this bad.

This is but one controversy that needs to sink this administration once and for all.  This nation can not afford to get another black eye from the corrupt administration.  haven’t we suffered enough from them?  They are too bust passing the buck, and blaming everyone else for their stupidity.  We are still being bombarded with Obama blaming Bush for the economic mess, even though he has been in office, and contributed to it, for four years.

This could, and should, be a big part of Obama’s Waterloo.

THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS TERRORISM IN THE U.S.A.

According to Merriam-Webster, terrorism is defined as:

“Systematic use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective (1).”

But that is according to the dictionary.  The White House, on the other hand, seems to have a completely different definition of what it is.

“Dzhokhar Tsarnaev”, Boston Marathon bombing suspect, “was charged with using a weapon of mass destruction and malicious destruction of property resulting in death. If convicted, he could be sentenced to death, life in prison, or a term of any number of years, the U.S. Justice Department said (2).”  Notice that there was no terrorism charge.  What a difference six days can make.

On Tuesday, April 16th, President Obama stood in front of the media and said, “”Given what we now know about what took place, the FBI is investigating it as an act of terrorism,” Obama said. “Anytime bombs are used to target innocent civilians, it is an act of terror (3).”  But today, April 22nd, Jay Carney, White House spokesman, stated; ”

WASHINGTON – President Obama believes the civilian justice system can handle cases of domestic terrorism and supports the decision to try the Boston Marathon bombing suspect in federal court, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Monday.

“The effective use of the criminal justice system has resulted in the interrogation, conviction and detention of both U.S. citizens and noncitizens for acts of terrorism committed inside the United States and around the world,” Carney said. “The system has repeatedly proven that it can successfully handle the threat that we continue to face.”

“He also noted that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev does not qualify for trial by military commission because he is a U.S. citizen. The 19-year-old immigrant from Russia became a citizen on Sept. 11, 2012 (4).”

But he stopped short of actually saying that it was a terrorist act.  To do so, would have violated what Obama is saying now.

Now after seeing all of this, plus seeing how the Obama Administration handles acts of terrorism, I have a very hard time understanding what does, or does not constitute as foreign, or domestic, terrorism.  Let’s look at how Obama has handled the other cases:

  1. The Times Square bomber pleaded guilty and was sentenced to life in prison (4).
  2. The so-called underwear bomber was sentenced to life in prison (4).
  3. A Somali national associated with Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula is currently in the U.S. justice system (4).
  4. Nidal Hassan, Fort Hood shooter, is still in federal prison awaiting trial.

My theory on this is that Barak (Barry Soetoro) Obama is using his Muslim Heritage to circumvent the United States Constitution and protect the people of his faith.  BUT… has he given the same consideration to non-Muslim’s?  No, he has not.

  1. U.S. Army Staff Sergeant Calvin Gibbs, an American soldier accused of masterminding the brutal killings of Afghan civilians in 2010, was put on trial October 26, 2011 (5).  Gibbs was sentenced to life in military prison with eligibility for parole in 10 years, on November 11, 2011, two weeks after he went on trial.
  2. Private First Class Andrew Holmes, 20, charged with murdering an Afghan civilian, conspiring to harm Afghans and using drugs during his deployment with the 5th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division.  Holmes was sentenced to a maximum of seven years in a military prison for murder and other crimes while deployed to Afghanistan. (6).
  3. Staff Sgt. Robert Bales is accused of slipping away from a remote outpost in southern Afghanistan, early on March 11, with an M-4 rifle outfitted with a grenade launcher to attack  the villages of Balandi and Alkozai, in the dangerous Panjwai district of  Kandahar Province (7).  Bales sentence is still pending.

If these soldiers were Muslims, they would be given all kinds of special treatment by Obama, because he seems to have no problem downgrading their charges to lesser ones.  Is it fair?  No, it isn’t.  We have laws that are designed to make it fair, and impartial, for everyone, but liberals seem to think that only certain groups have more, or less, rights than other ones.  How is it that a terrorist, who tried hard to kill and maim innocent people, has more rights than any other person?

When they attack innocent people, who are not armed or military members, with military grade explosives, they are waging war against the American people.  Waging war is not like two kids meeting on a parking lot to duke it out, because it in not simply between two disagreeing party’s.  In the fight, only the participants get hurt.  When terrorists blow up a device, it kills, maims, injures, and causes psychological damage to people who just happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Why shouldn’t they be subject to death for what they did?

We need to get on our elected representatives butts about continually allowing our Muslim Brotherhood president to get involved in who gets charged with what crimes, or downgrading them against people of the same heritage as he is.  This cannot continue, because it will create confusion as to what charges can, or cannot, be used against people, if the suspects are of the same persuasion of a person in authority.

 

References:

(1) http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism

(2) http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/22/us-usa-explosions-boston-shooting-idUSBRE93I0GQ20130422

(3) http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/04/16/obama-boston-marathon-bombing-remarks/2087565/

(4) http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-obama-boston-bombing-court-20130422,0,2323773.story

(5) http://www.voanews.com/content/us-soldier-goes-on-trial-for-civilian-atrocities-in-afghanistan-132746613/168149.html

(6) http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/30/us-soldiers-crimes-idUSTRE70S3SD20110130

(7) http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/04/hearing-begins-for-us-soldier-accused-in-afghanistan-massacre/#ixzz2RET5CD5P

 

1st Amendment explained, so that even an IDIOT can understand it

Amendment 1 – Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_Am1.html

When I hear a person say, “Separation of Church and State”, I get very angry because I know that they have no idea what they’re talking about. Well, when they’re done reading this blog, they will have a better understanding of it…unless they’re really that stupid. Although, I have heard them reply back saying, “Well, that’s your interpretation of what you think it means.” The 1st Amendment is not some Da Vinci Code to figure out. It is as plain as the nose on your face.

First, we need to break down the amendment to see what it says. No, this is not like passing a bill to see what’s in it, like Nancy Pelosi loves to do. So let’s examine what it says:

“Congress shall make no law respecting / prohibiting / abridging…”…what?

The first six words (including respecting, prohibiting, or abridging) are the key to not only the entire 1st Amendment, but the entire Bill of Rights. But what can congress make no laws respecting?

1) Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion.

This simply means that our government lacks the authority to establish a state run, or organized,

2) Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion.

This is where separation of the two really takes place.  If you look closely, you will find no reference to where worship is to take place, do you?  Therefore, congress cannot force you to worship only in a house of worship (the building itself is not the church, but the congregation is the church.  The building is only a house to worship in), for to do so would be a violation of this section of the amendment.  Also, they cannot prevent you from worshipping inside of a school, courthouse, on a public park bench, or any other taxpayer owned facility, because they are not privately owned by the government, but are owned by the tax paying public.   A privately owned business that serves the public (i.e.: restaurants, taverns, theaters, etc.) may be different, but doubtful since they cannot survive on non-religious patronage alone.

 

 

This provision ties in with the 2nd provision, because if you remove one of these provisions, you have removed the entire amendment.  Part of worship is

 

 

 

This means that the Congress cannot force the written, radio, or televised press to report propaganda, or to force them to refrain from reporting the truth, or both sides of an issue in a fair and unbiased method.

 

5) Congress shall make no laws abridging the right of the people to peaceably assemble.

 

This means that the people have a right to demonstrate against the government, or for reforms that need to be made to enhance the lives of the citizens.  As long as the people are not utilizing, or promoting, violence, there is no reason to prohibit them from exercising this right.

 

6) Congress shall make no laws abridging the right of the people to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

Simply stated; Congress cannot make a law that disallows the people the right to sue the government, if the government has wronged them in some way.  Nor can the congress disallow the citizens from demanding answers to issues that cause harm to the public at large.  Congress shall also lacks authority to pass laws to prevent information from reaching the public.

 

Now that I have broken down the 1st Amendment, it is my hope that people will now better understand what it says.  This is not my interpretation, but exactly what it says and means.  To think differently is showing lack of knowledge of the Constitution in general.

 

SOLUTION:

 

If our schools will not teach the US Constitution, and exactly what it means, then it is up to us to learn it for ourselves, and teach it to our children.  Failure to do so, will provide for the continued downfall of our nation into the socialist state that our government wishes for it to become.

 

 

 

 

 

Can We Abort Adults?

     I don’t know how many people have seen the video on Youtube, where supporters of Obama are actively trying to renounce the 1st Amendment rights of conservatives, but anyone who feels that way, in my opinion, should have their rights to life renounced.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SpHOaW99ST4

     After watching this video, I don’t know which is dumber: the ones pushing this petition, or the ones signing it.  There was even a black man that was targeted just because of his skin color.  One guy actually said, “Hey, you’re a black man…”, but the black man was too stupid to know that he was targeted for his skin color, or that he was being used as a pawn in Obama’s race war. 

THE PROBLEM

     We are living in a society where we have a president who is trying to start all kinds of wars, among all races, and among all classes.  When people like this start petitioning for the rights of a few to be nullified, they are ushering in an era of communism in which only a few have rights at all.

     When you look at the members of Congress, who are among the democrat side of things, it scares me to think that we have the right people in office to follow Obama into socialism or worse.

THE SOLUTION

     We have members of Congress who will not follow Obama, nor will they follow the new guidelines for the ‘improved’ GOP, who can fight the good fight.  However, they cannot do it alone.  They need our help to rid the capitol of the ilk that is infesting it.  This means that we need to spread the word about video’s like this one, and make people understand that this is wrong.  We also need to show people that the liberals are doing nothing to stop this nonsense.  How can they escape these facts from their voters?  They can’t.  Nor can they explain, or defend, that they wish to take away rights from people who have a different point of view.

In short, we need to either get rid of the people who are causing the problems, or get rid of the government and start over again.  I know that these people have a right to speak their minds, and that cannot be denied.  But they do not have the right to demand that other people’s rights should be revoked. 

How Can We Fall For the Lies?

So far this year, I have been very disappointed in our government and the people of this nation. Actually, I’ve been disappointed in the people for four long years. Why? Well, it all begins with a certain November evening in 2008, when a lot of ignorant, stupid people decided to believe the lies, and deception, of the democratic party and elected an inexperienced, cowardly, backstabbing liar to be our president.
I have heard this buffoon claim to be a Christian, yet he followed a “preacher” who spouted hatred against America. He was born to an Indonesian father, and raised in Indonesia until the age of 10. It was in Indonesia that the USS Stark was attacked by terrorists, and where Obama went to visit in his first year in office. I always thought that it was the policy of the United States to never deal with known terrorist nations?
Let’s look at the Muslim background of Obama. Now he claims that Muslims are a peace loving religion, but he also claims that Islam is not a religion. So which is it? Here is what one of their websites says:

“We hope to help people to resolve to humility, patience, tolerance and wisdom, rather than to rushed judgement and retribution. The current path will only propagate hatred and raise the fire of ignorance into a diabolically inspired inferno that will burn us all. Please approach this effort with an understanding that we are seeking to educate, learn and understand one-another, so that we will tolerate and love one-another. Hatred is not God’s will for us, and revenge only begets more vengeance, anger and hatred. If we can instead return love to those who show us hatred, we will befuddle the evil forces that seek to separate us as a human race.”(1)

If this were so, then why do Muslims expect that all people shall convert to Islam, but if a Muslim coverts to Christianity, they are considered an apostate and subject to death according to Sharia Laws:

“Introduction: From Mohamed S. El-Awa, Punishment in Islamic Law: A Comparative Study, American Trust Publications, Indianapolis, 1982, p. 54:

… it is common knowledge among Muslims that nothing is worse than becoming a disbeliever after being a Muslim.”

“1. From The Hedaya, or Guide: A Commentary on the Mussulman Laws, tr. Charles Hamilton, London, 1791, Vol. II, pp. 225-228:

When a Mussulman apostatizes from the faith, an exposition thereof is to be laid before him, in such a manner that if his apostasy should have arisen from any religious doubts or scruples, those may be removed. The reason for laying an exposition of the faith before him is that it is possible some doubts or errors may have arisen in his mind, which may be removed by such exposition; and as there are only two modes of repelling the sin of apostasy, namely, destruction or Islam, and Islam is preferable to destruction, the evil is rather to be removed by means of an exposition of the faith; — but yet this exposition of the faith is not incumbent, (according to what the learned have remarked upon this head), since a call to the faith has already reached the apostate.

“An apostate is to be imprisoned for three days, within which time if he return to the faith, it is well: but if not, he must be slain. — It is recorded in the Jama Sagheer that “an exposition of the faith is to be laid before an apostate, and if he refuse the faith, he must be slain:” — and with respect to what is above stated, that “he is to be imprisoned for three days,” it only implies that if he require a delay, three days may be granted him, as such is the term generally admitted and allowed for the purpose of consideration.”

“3. From Afzalur Rahman, Muhammad, Blessing for Mankind, Seerah Foundation, London, Revised Second Edition, 1988, p. 218 under “Apostasy”:

People who turn away from Islam and do not repent but wage war and create mischief in the land are also considered as murderers. “But if they break their oaths after making compacts and taunt you for your faith, you should fight with these ringleaders of disbelief because their oaths are not trustworthy: it may be that the sword alone will restrain them” (9:12).[1] And in Surah Al-Nahl, “But whosoever accepts disbelief willingly, he incurs God’s Wrath, and there is severe torment for all such people” (16:106).”(2)

Islam is a religion of deception. It is easy to see that the most gullible people on earth will fall for their teachings, because they lack the intelligence to see it for what it really is. Lying, or Taqiyya, is not forbidden, but is encouraged, by the Quran;

Qur’an (3:54) – “And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers.” The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means deceit. If Allah is deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)

Qur’an (2:225) – “Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts” The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.

Qur’an (66:2) – “Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths”(3)

Let’s look at the Qur’an (3:54) verse for a moment. Now the New Testament tells us to Walk in the Truth (2 John), and Jesus calls Satan, or Beelzebub, the father of lies, and the people who accept lies in this way;

“John 8:44
44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”

So how does a religion call itself a religion, when they allow for lies to be told?

Perhaps we now get a clearer view of why Obama is such a nitwit, and wants to destroy America by his lies. We need to guard our minds against the foolishness of this administration, and the Islamic religion, before we are destroyed. What these fools seem to forget, is that Americans are a free people, love our freedom, and most will fight to stay free, even if it means our death. In death, we are still free, and there is now way that a terrorist, or Obama, can take that freedom away from us.

References:
(1) http://www.innocenceofislam.org/index.html
(2) http://answering-islam.org/Hahn/Mawdudi/index.htm#appb
(3) http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/011-taqiyya.htm
(4) http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+8%3A44&version=NIV

RAIN TAX IN MARYLAND!

THE PROBLEM:

http://now.msn.com/maryland-institutes-rain-tax-to-raise-money-for-chesapeake-bay-estuary?ocid=ansnowex

You did not misread this. Maryland is imposing a RAIN TAX on their citizens to help cleanup the Chesapeake Estuary. According to the EPA, the main reason that the estuary is in bad shape is due to the runoff of rain from people’s roof and driveways. Therefore, they have ordered Maryland to clean it up. So, Governor Martin O’Malley decided to tax people for the rain falling on their property, and it will be assessed based on the size of the property. But he’s not calling it a RAIN TAX, but a FUNDRAISING FEE. Of course, Governor O’Malley is a democrat, which explains the lack of common sense in instituting this bill.

LOGIC TIME:

How much of the runoff getting into the estuary comes from salt spread on the roads by the government? How much runoff comes from the capitol building, government parking lots, governor’s residence, and other government buildings, and are they going to be taxed for it?

As much as I support the idea of keeping wildlife areas clean, and free from crud that will cause harm, how on earth do you justify this to those who do not live anywhere close to the estuary, but have to pay the rain tax?

Once again, a ‘knee-jerk’ reaction to a problem that needed more careful thought than instituting a rain tax.

SOLUTION:

Have you ever heard the phrase, “His name is Mudd!”? It stems from Dr. Mudd who took care of John Wilkes Booth’s broken leg, following his assassination of Abraham Lincoln. Well, I can only hope that O’Malley’s name somehow becomes synonymous with rain. How about a high pressure system, causing rain, being called ‘an O’Malley’?

What happens when a hurricane comes in, will they pay higher tax rates? The good people of Maryland had better hope that they don’t have one of those systems that seem to hang around for 10 days or more, or a wet spring / summer, or they may go broke.

Is there going to be government oversight to make sure that the money from the tax actually goes to the Chesapeake Estuary Cleanup Project, or will they do what the Obamunists do with the money and just spend it on whatever they please?

So what will we see next: TORNADO TAXES IN THE MIDWEST, MUDSLIDE TAXES ON THE WEST COAST, EARTHQUAKE TAXES, WIND TAXES, OR SUNLIGHT TAXES? I’d better shut up before some government hack sees this, and actually takes me seriously.